WHY ROMAN CATHOLIC DID NOT ALLOWED THEIR POPE AND PRIEST TO GET MARRIED? THEIR FIRST POPE PETER IS MARRIED.

QUESTION TO ROMAN CATHOLIC:

WHY ROMAN CATHOLIC DID NOT ALLOWED THEIR POPE AND PRIEST TO GET MARRIED?

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ROMAN CATHOLIC SAID PETER IS THEIR FIRST POPE!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TAKENOTE: PETER IS ALSO CEPHAS.

PETER/CEPHAS IS MARRIED COMMON SENSE THERE IS MOTHER IN LAW?

TAGALOG:

MATEO 8:14 Pumunta si Jesus sa bahay ni Pedro at nakita niya roon ang [[[biyenan]]] nito na nakaratay at nilalagnat.

I CORINTO 9:4 Wala ba kaming [[[[[karapatang magsama ng asawang Cristiano]]], [[[[[[[[tulad ng ginagawa ni PEDRO]]]]]]]]……….

ENGLISH:

VULGATE BIBLE 405 A.D.

MATTHEW 8:14 And when Jesus was come into Peter’s house, he saw his [[[[[[wife’s mother lying]]]]]], and sick of a fever;

1 CORINTHIANS 9:5 Have we not power to carry about a woman, a sister as well as the rest of the apostles and the brethren of the Lord and Cephas?

KING JAMES VERSION

Matthew 8:14And when Jesus was come into Peter’s house, he saw his wife’s mother laid, and sick of a fever.

1 Corinthians 9:5

5Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?

New International Version (NIV)

1 Corinthians 9:5

5 Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephas[a]?

Footnotes:

[a] 1 Corinthians 9:5 That is, Peter

8 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by carldecs on March 26, 2012 at 3:43 am

    Before Peter followed Jesus, he was married already. Then he left his family to follow Jesus. St. Paul warned that married preachers will not be able to work for Christ sufficiently so he advised against marrying if one is to serve the Lord.

    Reply

  2. Posted by Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam et Apostolicam Romanvm on March 31, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    Arman, Peter being married is one of the most STUPID arguments ever concerning his Papacy. Siempre naman, alam talaga namin na kasal at may asawa na si Pedro bago tawagin ni Jesus, THE FACT THAT WE CONSIDER PETER AS THE FIRST POPE IS A PROOF THAT PRIOR MARRIAGE IS NOT AN IMPEDIMENT AGAINST BEING A POPE.

    Luke 18:28-30 “Then Peter said, Lo, WE HAVE LEFT ALL, and followed thee. And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or WIFE, or CHILDREN, for the kingdom of God’s sake, Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.”

    Arman, sabi ni Pedro sa talata, “WE HAVE LEFT ALL.” Kahit nga “WIFE or CHILDREN, iniwan nila para lang masunod si Jesus.
    At bakit naman ‘di nag-aasawa ang sangkapari-an ng Santa Iglesia:

    Matthew 19:12 “For there are different reasons why men cannot marry: some, because they were born that way; others, because men made them that way; and others do not marry for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven. Let him who can accept this teaching do so.” [Good News Bible]

    In fact Arman, we have several Popes who are already married before coming into office pero iniwanan at lahat at sumuko nang TOTAL sa Dios.

    Lastly, yung grammar mo Arman ayusin mo para mabawas-bawasan yung kahihiyan mo, hahaha.

    -Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam et Apostolicam Romanvm

    Reply

    • HINDI LITERAL NA IWANAN ANG MGA PAMILYA YAN BABALIKAN MO DIN KAPAG UMAALIS KA YON ANG MEANING NIYAN KAYA NGA NG NANGANGARAL SI PEDRO KASA-KASAMA PA ASAWA NIYA DIBA?

      ANG KATALINUHAN NG TAO WALA SA ENGLISH GRAMMAR. MAGALING KA MAN SA ENGLISH WALA KA NAMANG READING COMPREHENSION WALA RIN.

      Reply

  3. Posted by Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam et Apostolicam Romanvm on April 1, 2012 at 12:04 pm

    Hahaha, kakatuwa ka talaga, kapag sinabi ba ni Pedro na iiwanan na niya ang makasalanang buhay, sasabihin mong DON’T TAKE IT LITERALLY kasi kapag iniwanan niya ang maruming pamumuhay, babalikan din niya. Hahaha, napaka-weak naman ng stand mo.

    Ngayon, asan nakasulat sa Biblia na BINALIKAN ni San Pedro ang asawa niya? Asan sa Biblia na KASA-KASAMA ni Pedro ang asawa niya habang nangangaral? Chapter and verse please. ‘wag kang padalos-dalos sa pananalita mo. It doesn’t make any sense. hahaha, kawawa naman.

    -Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam et Apostolicam Romanvm

    Reply

  4. HINDI MO PALA ALAM YAN IHO NA NAGSASAMA SI PEDRO NG ASAWA AT MGA ALAGAD KAWAWA KA NAMAN.

    Reply

  5. Posted by Ecclesiam Apostolicam Catholicam Ecclesiam... on April 14, 2012 at 9:27 pm

    Walang sinabi sa talatang iyan na kasa-kasama ni Pedro ang asawa niya sa kanyang pangangaral……..ang sabi diyan……

    Magandang Balita Biblia:

    “Wala ba kaming karapatang masama ng asawang Cristiano, tulad ng ginagawa ni Pedro, ng IBANG Apostol, at ng mga kapatid ng Panginoon.” (1 Corinto 9:5)

    Ang Bagong Ang Biblia Edisyon 2001

    “Wala ba kaming karapatang magsama ng ISANG ASAWA gaya ng ibang mga apostol at ng mga kapatid ng Panginoon, at Ni Cefas.” (1 Corinto 9:5)

    Ang Biblia

    “Wala baga kaming matuwid na magsipagsama ng ISANG ASAWA na sumasampalataya, gaya ng IBA’T IBANG mga apostol, at ng mga kapatid ng Panginoon, at ni Cefas?” (1 Corinto 9:5)

    ANG SABI DIYAN, MAGSAMA HINDI ISAMA ANG ASAWA, IBIG SABIHIN WALANG SINABI NA KASA-KASAMA NINA PEDRO AT NG IBANG APOSTOL ANG KANILANG MGA ASAWA SA PANGANGARAL……WALANG SINABI DIYAN NA ‘ WALA BA KAMING KARAPATANG MAGSAMA NG ISANG ASAWA SA PANGANGARAL?” KUNDI “WALA BA KAMING KARAPATANG MAGSAMA NG ISANG ASAWA.”……KAYA SAAN NAKASULAT DIYAN NA SINASABING KASA-KASAMA NINA PEDRO NG IBANG MGA APOSTOL ANG KANILANG MGA ASAWA SA PANGANGARAL?…..WALA…….

    Reply

    • YOUR POST:

      Magandang Balita Biblia:

      “Wala ba kaming karapatang magsama ng asawang Cristiano, tulad ng ginagawa ni Pedro, ng IBANG Apostol, at ng mga kapatid ng Panginoon.” (1 Corinto 9:5)

      Ang Bagong Ang Biblia Edisyon 2001

      “Wala ba kaming karapatang magsama ng ISANG ASAWA gaya ng ibang mga apostol at ng mga kapatid ng Panginoon, at Ni Cefas.” (1 Corinto 9:5)

      *************
      ARMAN’S REPLY:
      *************
      Basahin mo nga ulit at unawain kaliwa-liwanag ng unang pahayag sa pangungusap.

      “Wala ba kaming karapatang magsama ng asawang Cristiano,……
      “Wala ba kaming karapatang magsama ng ISANG ASAWA gaya ng ibang mga apostol…….

      ANG TOPIC DIYAN AY PAGSASAMA NG ASAWA SA PANGANGARAL DIBA?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: